Apologies for any cross-postings.
Human Relations special issue:
Organizational justice and behavioural ethics
Guest Editors: Jonathan R Crawshaw, Russell Cropanzano, Chris M Bell, and Thierry Nadisic
July 2013; Vol. 66, No. 7
This new issue special issue of Human Relations is available online – we hope you enjoy reading the articles, which will be free to access until 17 July 2013.
The associated vodcast will remain free to access: Guest Editor Dr Jonathan R Crawshaw introduces practitioners and academics to the special issue and looks at how its contents – a review of research to date working at the interface between justice theory and behavioural ethics plus five innovative papers – demonstrate how behavioural ethics can help answer key questions about justice at work.
The entire issue can be accessed online at: http://hum.sagepub.com/content/vol66/issue7/?etoc .
________________________________________
Vodcast – free to access indefinitely
________________________________________
Organizational justice and behavioural ethics
Human Relations July 2013
http://bcove.me/kvh3rdk1
________________________________________
Articles - free to access until 17 July
________________________________________
Organizational justice: New insights from behavioural ethics
Jonathan R Crawshaw, Russell Cropanzano, Chris M Bell, and Thierry Nadisic
Human Relations 2013;66 885-904
http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/66/7/885
Bounded autonomy and behavioral ethics: Deonance and reactance as competing motives
Robert Folger, Deshani B Ganegoda, Darryl B Rice, Regina Taylor, and David XH Wo
Human Relations 2013;66 905-924
http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/66/7/905
To act out, to withdraw, or to constructively resist? Employee reactions to supervisor abuse of customers and the moderating role of employee moral identity
Rebecca L Greenbaum, Mary Bardes Mawritz, David M Mayer, and Manuela Priesemuth
Human Relations 2013;66 925-950
http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/66/7/925
Ethical leadership, moral equity judgments, and discretionary workplace behavior
Christian J Resick, Michael B Hargis, Ping Shao, and Scott B Dust
Human Relations 2013;66 951-972
http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/66/7/951
When do leaders grant voice? How leaders' perceptions of followers' control and belongingness needs affect the enactment of fair procedures
Niek Hoogervorst, David De Cremer, and Marius van Dijke
Human Relations 2013;66 973-992
http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/66/7/973
How can companies decrease the disruptive effects of stretch goals? The moderating role of interpersonal- and informational- justice climates
Zhe Zhang and Ming Jia
Human Relations 2013;66 993-1020
http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/66/7/993
________________________________________
Call for papers
________________________________________
30th anniversary – Beyond Morgan's eight metaphors
Human Relations 2013;66 1021-1023
http://www.tavinstitute.org/humanrelations/special_issues/Morgan.html
We are delighted to announce that the Human Relations Impact
Factor has increased to 1.938 (up from 1.729) and is now ranked 44th
(out of 172 journals) in Management and 7th (out of 92 journals)
in the Social Science Interdisciplinary categories.
The 5 Year Impact Factor is now 2.901 and the journal is ranked
38th in Management and 6th in Social Sciences Interdisciplinary.
Source: 2012 Journal Citation Reports® (Thomson Reuters, 2013)
As always, please get in touch if you have any comments or queries about Human Relations.
All best wishes,
Claire Castle
Managing Editor, Human Relations
Email: c.castle@tavinstitute.org
www.humanrelationsjournal.org